AYJ Carrier Intel
Carrier Risk Intelligence

Vet carriers in under 60 seconds.

AYJ checks authority, insurance, documents, and double-brokering risk signals, then returns a clear Go / Review / No-Go report with an audit trail.

View example report Use intake checklist
20 checks to understand carrier review volume and patterns
Go / Review / No-Go plain-English risk decision support
Audit trail source-linked notes for every flag

Built for brokers who cannot afford a bad carrier decision.

Send a carrier name, MC/DOT number, and packet. AYJ returns a risk report that explains what was checked and why the decision came back Go, Review, or No-Go.

Authority and identity

FMCSA/SAFER checks, entity consistency, authority status, operating history, and obvious mismatch signals.

Insurance and packet review

COI and W-9 review for names, dates, certificate holder details, coverage signals, and document consistency.

Double-brokering risk

Public signal checks, profile inconsistencies, recent changes, contact mismatches, and human-readable risk notes.

Simple intake for a validation review.

For the first validation sprint, AYJ only needs the carrier identity, packet, and broker contact. This keeps the workflow manual enough to learn, but structured enough to become software later.

hello@ayj.ai
  • Carrier nameLegal/entity name exactly as shown in the packet.
  • MC or DOT numberThe identifier used to check public authority and profile details.
  • COI and W-9PDFs or screenshots for insurance, naming, dates, and document consistency review.
  • Broker emailWhere the Go / Review / No-Go report should be returned.

Example report: what a broker gets back.

This is an anonymized sample format, not a claim about a real carrier. The purpose is to show the decision structure, source notes, and review trail AYJ returns from a carrier packet.

Carrier Vetting Report

Sample Carrier LLC · MC 123456 · DOT 7654321 · reviewed from carrier packet, public registry checks, and document consistency signals.

Decision REVIEW Human approval recommended before tendering load.

Inputs checked

Carrier name, MC/DOT, COI, W-9, contact email, phone number, website/domain, public registry profile, and packet metadata.

Decision reason

Authority appears active, but insurance naming and contact consistency require broker review before the carrier is treated as cleared.

Clear signals

  • Authority status appears active in public records.
  • Entity name broadly matches packet and registry profile.
  • Coverage dates appear current in the submitted COI.

Review flags

  • COI named insured uses a close variant of the registry entity name.
  • Certificate holder details need confirmation against broker requirements.
  • Submitted phone/email do not fully match public profile signals.

  • Audit trail

    AYJ records each checked source, the extracted fields, the match/mismatch outcome, and a short explanation of why the report returned Go, Review, or No-Go.

  • Next action

    Broker should confirm insured entity naming, validate contact details from an independent source, and clear the packet internally before tendering.

Need a faster carrier review path?

AYJ can review one packet, explain the risk signals, and map what a repeatable carrier-vetting workflow would look like for your brokerage.

Use the intake checklist